Abstract
Despite decades of investment in electronic claims processing, a substantial proportion of healthcare insurance claims still depend on unstructured clinical artifacts such as physician progress notes, discharge summaries, operative reports, pathology narratives, and scanned medical records. These free-text sources often contain the most critical evidence for medical necessity, diagnosis–procedure alignment, and compliance with coverage policies, yet they remain poorly exploited by traditional rule-based adjudication systems that are optimized for structured codes andtabular data. This paper examines the role of artificial intelligence driven Natural Language Processing (NLP) in transforming unstructured claims data into actionable signals for automated and semi-automated adjudication. We analyze how contemporary NLP models ranging from clinical named entity recognition and medical concept normalization to transformer-based contextual embeddings enable the extraction of diagnoses, procedures, temporal events, and provider intent from heterogeneous clinical narratives. Particular emphasis is placed on challenges unique to the medical domain, including terminological ambiguity, negation, context sensitivity, clinical abbreviations, and cross-document inference. The study further explores how NLP-derived features can be reconciled with structured claims standards such as X12 EDI andHL7 FHIR, enabling hybrid adjudication pipelines that combine narrative intelligence with coded data. By positioning NLP as a semantic bridge between clinical documentation and claims infrastructure, this work highlights its potential to reduce manual review rates, accelerate decision timelines, and improve adjudication accuracy while preserving regulatory compliance and
auditability.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Sanjay Bandare (Author)